I will pay for the following article The Reformulation Benthams Theory of Utilitarianism. The work is to be 9 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. Utilitarianism is imp essential its relationship to the development of empirical standards in science to replace theological justifications of right and wrong in society, a and growth of democracy, which required a solution to moral issues related to the disagreement among groups with different standards of belief.
Utilitarianism is often summarized as “the greatest good for the greatest number” being used to calculate the moral correctness of an action, decision, or policy for both individuals and society on a common standard. . According to Larsen (2011), Utilitarianism is “a normative ethical theory under ethical Naturalism” and also a “teleological – consequential (outcome based) outcome-asadero”. (Larsen, 20.”) This means that Utilitarianism ideally judges actions based upon their outcome in society in producing the greatest good for the greatest number most significant of be through be ustorystoryghoduction of this social good. Utilitarianism as a guide to personal behavior can relate to private expo happineexperienceasure as a guide to conduct and recognition of society’s greater good as a higher motivation for service. Through this, the basis for moral action is established in Utilitarianism for both the individual and society.
One of the significant Bentham and Mill differed in their theory of Utilitarianism is that Bentham based his definition of ‘the good’ in a limited formulation of pleasure and pain that defined happiness objectively through the individual, but tended to reduce Utilitarianism to the principles of hedonism, while Mill based his definition of Utilitarianism in a conceptually expanded view of happiness that included societal ideals, virtues, and altruistic beliefs of human activity into the present ‘the greater good’ in a more comprehensive in, the broader river, 2009) Another difference is that Bentham is regarded retrospectively as proposing “Act Utilitarianism” where.” In contrast, Mill advocate “Rule Utilitarianism.” (Lotito, 2002). Act Utilitarianism applies logic and reasoning to each individual and collective activity to determine through direct cognition, moral reasoning, and reflection whether or not the action serves the happiness of the most significant number of people.