My public policy issue is domestic violence.
Overview: For this assignment, due in Module Five, you will submit a 2–3 page draft of your historical analysis as well as your analysis of criminological theories
relevant to your public policy issue selection. You will analyze the history of the public policies (related decisions, actions, laws, and or positions of both the state
and federal government) related to your selected public policy issue. This draft should be as detailed as possible in order to allow the instructor to provide
significant feedback, which you can incorporate into your final project.
Completing an analysis of the history of your selected public policy issue and analyzing the criminological theory that best explains the development of the public
policies related to it in this milestone will lay the groundwork you for your Milestone Three submission in Module Seven, where you will identify the specific
public needs that are targeted by the issue and determine how well the policy addresses those needs. You will then be examining how the policy can be changed
or improved upon to continue to address the identified need and how these changes can be accomplished while at the same time improving upon the delivery of
necessary criminal justice services.
Prompt: Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Historical Analysis: To inform your recommendations for the departmental public policy, you will analyze the history of the selected public policy issue,
identifying key influential trends, and predict the potential future direction of the state or federal policies in supporting this issue. Specifically:
a) Identify key trends, both modern and historical, that have shaped the evolution of the state or federal public policies surrounding your selected
public policy issue, justifying your identifications. How have the policies around this issue evolved, and what trends have influenced this
evolution?
b) Identify court cases that have shaped the evolution of the public policies related to your chosen public policy issue, justifying your identifications.
c) How have the previously identified historical events impacted the public’s perception of the relevant state or federal public policies? Provide
specific examples. How has public perception evolved in relation to these specified events?
d) Predict the potential future direction of the state or federal public policies based on the previously identified historical and modern trends. How
might the state or federal public policy continue to evolve?
II. Criminological Theory: Now that you have analyzed the related state or federal public policies, you will analyze relevant criminological theory.
a) Select a criminological theory that best explains the development of the public policies related to the issue, justifying your selection. Consider
how the theory explains the previously identified influence of the trends or court cases on the development of the policies.
b) Draw connections between the selected criminological theory and the departmental policy. Where are there specific connections between the
theory and the departmental policy?
c) Draw connections between the selected criminological theory and the related state or federal public policies. Where are there specific
connections between the theory and the selected state or federal policies?
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your submission needs to be 2–3 pages in length (excluding reference pages), double spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-
inch margins, and citations in APA style. Cite your sources within the text of your paper and on the reference page.
Refer to the Criminal Justice Library Tips for assistance in finding and citing outside sources.
Please note that the grading rubric for this milestone submission is not identical to that of the final project. The Final Project Rubric will include an additional
“Exemplary” category that provides guidance as to how you can go above and beyond “Proficient” in your final submission.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (80%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Historical Analysis:
Trends
Identifies key trends, both historical
and modern, that have shaped the
evolution of the state or federal
public policies surrounding the
selected public policy issue,
justifying identifications
Identifies key trends that have
shaped the evolution of the state or
federal public policies surrounding
the selected public policy issue,
justifying identifications, but with
gaps in detail or accuracy or does
not identify historical and modern
trends
Does not identify key trends that
have shaped the evolution of the
state or federal public policies
surrounding the selected public
policy issue, justifying identifications
13
Historical Analysis:
Court Cases
Identifies court cases that have
shaped the evolution of the public
policies related to the chosen public
policy issue, justifying identifications
Identifies court cases that have
shaped the evolution of the public
policies related to the chosen public
policy issue, justifying
identifications, but with gaps in
detail, accuracy, or logic
Does not identify court cases that
have shaped the evolution of the
public policies related to the chosen
public policy issue, justifying
identifications
13
Historical Analysis:
Public Perception
Analyzes how the identified
historical events impacted the
public’s perception of the relevant
state or federal public policies,
providing specific examples
Analyzes how the identified
historical events impacted the
public’s perception of the relevant
state or federal public policies, but
with gaps in support, detail, or
accuracy
Does not analyze how the identified
historical events impacted the
public’s perception of the relevant
state or federal public policies
13
Historical Analysis:
Future Direction
Predicts the potential future
direction of the state or federal
public policies based on previously
identified historical and modern
trends
Predicts the potential future
direction of the state or federal
public policies based on the
previously identified historical and
modern trends, but with gaps in
detail or logic
Does not predict the potential
future direction of the state or
federal public policies based on the
previously identified historical and
modern trends
13
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
http://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/course_repository/graduate/cj/cj520/cj520_criminal_justice_library_tips
Criminological
Theory: Select Theory
Selects criminological theory that
best explains the development of
the public policies related to the
issue, justifying selection
Selects criminological theory that
best explains the development of
the public policies related to the
issue, justifying selection, but with
gaps in detail, accuracy, or logic
Does not select criminological
theory that best explains the
development of the public policies
related to the issue, justifying
selection
13
Criminological
Theory: Theory and
Departmental Policy
Draws connections between the
selected criminological theory and
the departmental policy
Draws connections between the
selected criminological theory and
the departmental policy, but with
gaps in detail or accuracy
Does not draw connections between
the selected criminological theory
and the departmental policy
13
Criminological
Theory: Draw
Connections to State
or Federal Public
Policies
Draws connections between the
selected criminological theory and
the related state or federal public
policies
Draws connections between the
selected criminological theory and
the related state or federal public
policies, but with gaps in detail or
accuracy
Does not draw connections between
the selected criminological theory
and the related state or federal
public policies
13
Articulation of
Response
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax
Submission has major errors related
to citations, grammar, spelling, or
syntax that negatively impact
readability and articulation of main
ideas
Submission has critical errors related
to citations, grammar, spelling, or
syntax that prevent understanding
of ideas
9
Total 100%
Filename:
CJ 520 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric
Report created by:
Organization:
[Enter personal and organization information through the Preferences > Identity dialog.]
The checker found no problems in this document.
: 2
manually: 0
: 1
| Document | |
| Accessibility permission flag | Accessibility permission flag must be set |
| Image-only PDF | Document is not image-only PDF |
| Tagged PDF | Document is tagged PDF |
| Logical Reading Order | Document structure provides a logical reading order |
| Primary language | Text language is specified |
| Title | Document title is showing in title bar |
| Bookmarks | Bookmarks are present in large documents |
| Color contrast | Document has appropriate color contrast |
| Page Content | |
| Tagged content | All page content is tagged |
| Tagged annotations | All annotations are tagged |
| Tab order | Tab order is consistent with structure order |
| Character encoding | Reliable character encoding is provided |
| Tagged multimedia | All multimedia objects are tagged |
| Screen flicker | Page will not cause screen flicker |
| Scripts | No inaccessible scripts |
| Timed responses | Page does not require timed responses |
| Navigation links | Navigation links are not repetitive |
| Forms | |
| Tagged form fields | All form fields are tagged |
| Field descriptions | All form fields have description |
| Alternate Text | |
| Figures alternate text | Figures require alternate text |
| Nested alternate text | Alternate text that will never be read |
| Associated with content | Alternate text must be associated with some content |
| Hides annotation | Alternate text should not hide annotation |
| Other elements alternate text | Other elements that require alternate text |
| Tables | |
| Rows | TR must be a child of Table, THead, TBody, or TFoot |
| TH and TD | TH and TD must be children of TR |
| Headers | Tables should have headers |
| Regularity | Tables must contain the same number of columns in each row and rows in each column |
| Summary | Tables must have a summary |
| Lists | |
| List items | LI must be a child of L |
| Lbl and LBody | Lbl and LBody must be children of LI |
| Headings | |
| Appropriate nesting |
Back to Top
Overview
For your final project, you will develop a basic departmental policy recommendation to address a public need. You will analyze historical data and relevant state
or federal policies, apply relevant criminological theories, and evaluate the potential impact of the departmental policy on the general public.
Public policy can be defined as the decisions, actions, laws, and positions of both the state and federal government. A public policy issue is at the center of public
policy, and the state and federal government react to the issue and make decisions such as creating laws and regulations to help address the public policy issue.
Public policies also provide guidance and direction to public safety organizations and are the principles that guide the actions of the personnel. The term public
policy is not normally used to denote what is actually done. Departmental policies are the procedures or protocols that are created to address this public policy
issue, and these departmental policies are what will be scrutinized in a highly publicized incident. Therefore, it is vital that departmental policies are developed
and updated to be consistent with public policy, to address issues within public policy, and to best serve the interests of the department and the community. To
do so effectively, criminological theories are applied to address specific motives and underlying factors influencing the issue at hand. These theories assist in
developing departmental policies that can stand the test of time, not conflict with public policy, and remain flexible enough to adapt to societal changes.
The project is divided into three milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final
submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Three, Five, and Seven. The final product will be submitted in Module Nine.
This assessment addresses the following course outcomes:
Analyze criminological theories for their influence on the development of departmental and public policies
Assess the extent to which public policies address the needs of the public and criminal justice system by applying criminological theories
Evaluate the potential impact of policy recommendations on communities and the criminal justice system for informing appropriate policy development
and implementation
Analyze trends impacting the evolution of public policies for drawing informed conclusions on future policy development
Propose policy recommendations for improving the delivery of criminal justice services
Prompt
For this project, you will play the part of an individual recently promoted in a criminal justice organization. Your new supervisor recognizes that you are an up-
and-coming asset for the department and acknowledges that your advanced degree gives you an edge over some of the other employees in a project that needs
to be completed as soon as possible. Your supervisor tells you that after some highly publicized news events, many departmental policies have been found to be
outdated and insufficient in unspecified areas in relation to issues within public policy. The departmental policies need to be revised to include justification for
the policies, as well as relevant theory to support the operations. Your supervisor has provided a list of public policy issues, and you will select one public policy
issue as well as a related departmental policy that attempts to address the issue. You will be tasked with analyzing the public policy issue and developing
recommendations to improve the corresponding departmental policy to better address the specific issue. To develop an informed departmental policy
recommendation, you will also analyze relevant criminological theories and relevant public policies.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Introduction: Describe your selected public policy issue, corresponding departmental policy, and explain the connection between the public policy issue
and specific departmental policy.
II. Historical Analysis: To inform your recommendations for the departmental public policy, you will analyze the history of the selected public policy issue,
identifying key influential trends, and predict the potential future direction of the state or federal policies in supporting this issue. Specifically:
a) Identify key trends, both modern and historical, that have shaped the evolution of the state or federal public policies surrounding your selected
public policy issue, justifying your identifications. How have the policies around this issue evolved, and what trends have influenced this
evolution?
b) Identify court cases that have shaped the evolution of the public policies related to your chosen public policy issue, justifying your identifications.
c) How have the previously identified historical events impacted the public’s perception of the relevant state or federal public policies? Provide
specific examples. How has public perception evolved in relation to these specified events?
d) Predict the potential future direction of the state or federal public policies based on the previously identified historical and modern trends. How
might the state or federal public policy continue to evolve?
III. Criminological Theory: Now that you have analyzed the related state or federal public policies, you will analyze relevant criminological theory.
a) Select a criminological theory that best explains the development of the public policies related to the issue, justifying your selection. Consider
how the theory explains the previously identified influence of the trends or court cases on the development of the policies.
b) Draw connections between the selected criminological theory and the departmental policy. Where are there specific connections between the
theory and the departmental policy?
c) Draw connections between the selected criminological theory and the related state o r federal public policies. Where are there specific
connections between the theory and the selected state or federal policies?
IV. Needs: Now that you have analyzed the relevant state or federal policies and selected a related criminological theory, you will focus your analysis on your
selected departmental policy. In relation to the departmental policy, you will identify the needs of the public and the relevant branch of the criminal
justice system, and assess the extent to which the policy currently addresses these needs. Specifically:
a) Identify specific needs of the public and the relevant branch of the criminal justice system at the center of the departmental policy, justifying
your identifications.
b) To what extent does the departmental policy address these specific needs?
V. Policy Recommendations: In this section, you will provide specific recommendations to the existing departmental public policy to improve the delivery
of criminal justice services, justifying your recommendations, and examining the impact of the recommendations on the public and specific branch of the
criminal justice system. Be sure to:
a) Outline the specific aspects of the departmental policy you are targeting for your recommendations, justifying your selections. What specific
aspects of the departmental policy need improving and why?
b) What specific recommendations do you have to improve the existing departmental policy?
c) Justify how the recommendations will improve the delivery of criminal justice services. Provide specific examples.
d) How does criminological theory support your recommendations? How do the recommendations support the public’s needs? Consider how
theory justifies the appropriateness of the recommendations for the departmental policy.
e) What are the potential impacts of the departmental policy recommendations on the public and the relevant branch of the criminal justice
system? Provide specific examples. If the potential impacts are negative, how might you alter your recommendations?
f) How does your assessment of the potential impacts inform your departmental policy implementation? For example, how can you capitalize on
positive reactions in the implementation of the departmental policy? How might you create buy-in where there is possible conflict?
Milestones
Milestone One: Departmental Policy and Issue Selection and Introduction
In Module Three, you will submit a 1–2-page document introducing the public policy issue that your departmental policy will seek to address. First, review the
document A List of Public Policy Issues and select an issue. Next, review the document Examples of Departmental Policies and select a departmental policy that
you plan to make improvement recommendations for to address this issue. Discuss related public policies (decisions, actions, laws, and/or positions) of both the
state and federal government on the issue that you seek to address with your departmental policy. Describe your selected policy issue, the related state or
federal positions or actions on the issue, and explain the connection between the departmental policy and state or federal guidance on the issue. This milestone
is graded with the Milestone One Rubric.
Milestone Two: Historical Analysis and Analysis of Relevant Criminological Theories
In Module Five, you will submit the 2–3-page draft of your historical analysis as well as your analysis of criminological theories relevant to your public policy issue
selection. You will analyze the history of the public policies (related decisions, actions, laws, and/or positions of both the state and federal government) related to
your selected public policy issue. This draft should be as detailed as possible in order to allow the instructor to provide significant feedback. This milestone is
graded with the Milestone Two Rubric.
Milestone Three: Public Needs and Policy Recommendations
In Module Seven, you will submit the 2–3-page public needs and policy recommendations sections of your final project. This milestone is really about drilling
down more deeply into the “drivers” behind your recommendations to the selected departmental policy. As you write these sections, you will identify what
public needs are targeted by this policy and determine how well the policy addresses these needs. You will also need to examine how this policy can be changed
or improved upon to continue to address the identified need and how these changes can be accomplished while at the same time improving upon the delivery of
necessary criminal justice services. Ensure that you support your recommendations with relevant criminological theory. The draft should also incorporate the
research you have performed up to this point as set forward in Milestones One and Two. This milestone is graded with the Milestone Three Rubric.
http://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/course_repository/graduate/cj/cj520/cj520_list_of_public_policy_issues
http://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/course_repository/graduate/cj/cj520/cj520_examples_of_departmental_policies
Final Submission: Policy Recommendation Report
In Module Nine, you will submit your policy recommendation report. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final
product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This final submission will be graded using the Final Project Rubric.
Deliverables
Milestone Deliverable Module Due Grading
One Departmental Policy and Issue Selection
and Introduction
Three Graded separately; Milestone One Rubric
Two Historical Analysis and Analysis of Relevant
Criminological Theories
Five Graded separately; Milestone Two Rubric
Three Public Needs and Policy Recommendations Seven Graded separately; Milestone Three Rubric
Final Submission: Policy Recommendation
Report
Nine Graded separately; Final Project Rubric
Final Project Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your policy recommendation report must be 6–8 pages in length and adhere to standard formatting (double-spaced, 12-point Times
New Roman font, one-inch margins) and citations must be in APA style.
Most of the critical elements align with a particular course outcome (shown in brackets).
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Introduction Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates keen insight into
the connection between public
policy issues and departmental
policies
Describes the selected public
policy issue, corresponding
departmental policy, and
explains the connection
between the public policy issue
and departmental policy
Describes the selected public
policy issue, corresponding
departmental policy, but does
not sufficiently explain the
connection between the public
policy issue and departmental
policy
Does not describe the selected
public policy issue and
corresponding departmental
policy, and does not explain the
connection between the public
policy issue and departmental
policy
5
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
Historical Analysis:
Trends
[CJ-520-04]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates keen insight into
how trends have shaped the
evolution of state or federal
public policies surrounding the
selected public policy issue
Identifies key trends, both
historical and modern, that
have shaped the evolution of
the state or federal public
policies surrounding the
selected public policy issue,
justifying identifications
Identifies key trends that have
shaped the evolution of the
state or federal public policies
surrounding the selected public
policy issue, justifying
identifications, but with gaps in
detail or accuracy or does not
identify historical and modern
trends
Does not identify key trends
that have shaped the evolution
of the state or federal public
policies surrounding the
selected public policy issue,
justifying identifications
6
Historical Analysis:
Court Cases
[CJ-520-04]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates keen insight into
how court cases have shaped
the evolution of the public
policies related to the chosen
public policy issue
Identifies court cases that have
shaped the evolution of the
public policies related to the
chosen public policy issue,
justifying identifications
Identifies court cases that have
shaped the evolution of the
public policies related to the
chosen public policy issue,
justifying identifications, but
with gaps in detail, accuracy, or
logic
Does not identify court cases
that have shaped the evolution
of the public policies related to
the chosen public policy issue,
justifying identifications
6
Historical Analysis:
Public Perception
[CJ-520-03]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates keen insight into
the impact of historical events
on public perception of the
relevant state or federal public
policies
Analyzes how the identified
historical events impacted the
public’s perception of the
relevant state or federal public
policies, providing specific
examples
Analyzes how the identified
historical events impacted the
public’s perception of the
relevant state or federal public
policies, but with gaps in
support, detail, or accuracy
Does not analyze how the
identified historical events
impacted the public’s
perception of the relevant state
or federal public policies
6
Historical Analysis:
Future Direction
[CJ-520-04]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates keen insight into
drawing informed conclusions
on future policy development
Predicts the potential future
direction of the state or federal
public policies based on
previously identified historical
and modern trends
Predicts the potential future
direction of the state or federal
public policies based on the
previously identified historical
and modern trends, but with
gaps in detail or logic
Does not predict the potential
future direction of the state or
federal public policies based on
the previously identified
historical and modern trends
6
Criminological
Theory: Select Theory
[CJ-520-01]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates keen insight into
the appropriate selection of
criminological theory that
explains the development of
public policies
Selects criminological theory
that best explains the
development of the public
policies related to the issue,
justifying selection
Selects criminological theory
that best explains the
development of the public
policies related to the issue,
justifying selection, but with
gaps in detail, accuracy, or logic
Does not select criminological
theory that best explains the
development of the public
policies related to the issue,
justifying selection
6
Criminological
Theory: Theory and
Departmental Policy
[CJ-520-01]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates keen insight into
the connections between
criminological theory and
public policies
Draws connections between
the selected criminological
theory and the departmental
policy
Draws connections between
the selected criminological
theory and the departmental
policy, but with gaps in detail or
accuracy
Does not draw connections
between the selected
criminological theory and the
departmental policy
6
Criminological
Theory: Draw
Connections to State
or Federal Public
Policies [CJ-520-01]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates keen insight into
the connections between
criminological theory and
public policies
Draws connections between
the selected criminological
theory and the related state or
federal public policies
Draws connections between
the selected criminological
theory and the related state or
federal public policies, but with
gaps in detail or accuracy
Does not draw connections
between the selected
criminological theory and the
related state or federal public
policies
6
Needs: Identify Needs
[CJ-520-02]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates keen insight into
the application of
criminological theory to
identify needs of the public and
criminal justice system
Identifies specific needs of the
public and the relevant branch
of the criminal justice system at
the center of the departmental
policy, justifying identifications
with selected criminological
theory
Identifies needs of the public
and the relevant branch of the
criminal justice system at the
center of the departmental
policy, justifying identifications
with selected criminological
theory, but with gaps in logic,
specificity of needs, or
justification
Does not identify needs of the
public and the relevant branch
of the criminal justice system at
the center of the departmental
policy, justifying identifications
with selected criminological
theory
6
Needs: Address
Needs
[CJ-520-02]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates keen insight into
the assessment of policies to
address needs and application
of criminological theory
Assesses the extent to which
the departmental policy
addresses the needs, justifying
assessment with criminological
theory
Assesses the extent to which
the departmental policy
addresses the needs, justifying
assessment with criminological
theory, but with gaps in detail,
logic, or application of theory
Does not assess the extent to
which the departmental policy
addresses the needs, justifying
assessment with criminological
theory
6
Policy
Recommendations:
Policy Targeted
[CJ-520-05]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates keen insight into
identifying specific aspects of
public policies that need
improvement
Outlines the specific aspects of
the departmental policy that
will be targeted, justifying
selections
Outlines the aspects of the
departmental policy that will
be targeted, justifying
selections, but with gaps in
detail, logic, or specificity
Does not outline the aspects of
the departmental policy that
will be targeted, justifying
selections
6
Policy
Recommendations:
Recommendations
[CJ-520-05]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
recommendations to improve
existing policy are particularly
insightful
Proposes specific
recommendations to improve
the existing departmental
policy
Proposes recommendations to
improve the existing
departmental policy, but with
gaps in detail, logic, or
specificity
Does not propose
recommendations to improve
the existing departmental
policy
6
Policy
Recommendations:
Improve Delivery
[CJ-520-05]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates keen insight into
how the recommendations will
improve the delivery of
criminal justice services
Justifies how the
recommendations will improve
the delivery of criminal justice
services, providing specific
examples
Justifies how the
recommendations will improve
the delivery of criminal justice
services, providing specific
examples, but with gaps in
detail, logic, or support
Does not justify how the
recommendations will improve
the delivery of criminal justice
services, providing specific
examples
6
Policy
Recommendations:
Appropriateness
[CJ-520-02]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates keen insight into
the extent to which theory
supports the recommendations
for meeting the needs of the
public
Justifies the appropriateness of
recommendations in meeting
the public’s needs, using
criminological theory
Justifies the appropriateness of
recommendations in meeting
the public’s needs, using
criminological theory, but with
gaps in detail, logic, or
application of theory
Does not justify the
appropriateness of the
recommendation in meeting
the public’s needs, using
criminological theory
6
Policy
Recommendations:
Potential Impacts
[CJ-520-03]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates keen insight into
evaluating the potential impact
of policy recommendations on
the public and the criminal
justice system
Evaluates the potential impacts
of the departmental policy
recommendations on the
public and relevant branch of
the criminal justice system,
providing specific examples,
and explains how
recommendations may be
altered based on evaluation
Evaluates the potential impacts
of the departmental policy
recommendations on the
public and relevant branch of
the criminal justice system, and
explains how
recommendations may be
altered based on evaluation,
but with gaps in detail, logic, or
support
Does not evaluate the potential
impacts of the departmental
policy recommendations on the
public and relevant branch of
the criminal justice system,
providing specific examples
6
Policy
Recommendations:
Inform
Implementation
[CJ-520-03]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates keen insight into
implementation strategies
based on assessment of
potential impacts of the policy
Draws informed conclusions on
implementation strategies
based on assessment of
potential impacts of the
departmental policy
Draws conclusions on
implementation strategies, but
conclusions have gaps in detail
or logic
Does not draw conclusions on
implementation strategies,
based on assessment of
potential impacts to the policy
6
Articulation of
Response
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization and is presented
in a professional and easy-to-
read format
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact
readability and articulation of
main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas
5
Total 100%
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Achiever Papers is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Dissertation Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, if anything is unclear, you may always chat with us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download