Hi, need to submit a 1250 words paper on the topic Civilization depends on the repression of instincts. How would Kant and Nietzsche respond to this statement. The first ideal denotes the Kantian epitome of a republican civilization, while the other culture is categorized by Nietzsche’s Dionysian concept of confusion. The main variation amid these two kinds of cultures stems from the role of the individual in their organizations, which opens the way for the debate on ethical philosophy and its connection with consideration of the normal world (Owen) (Bennett) (sapere-aude).
It is evident that Civilization comes as a result of human interaction with nature, administering it to work to his advantage. This stages the fact that humans are in constant trial to look for ways to ease our mandatory tasks in the environment. The process however involves gradual change of simple systems in place, to a more societal complex system. With a complex system in place, more ideas emerge to even simplify the complexity and thereby additional developments come in handy. This illustrates that civilization is a continuous process.
This paper talks on the sway of the moral philosophies discipline of Kant and Nietzsche, which is inspired by their dogmatic thoughts. The discussion is divided into two chapters to deal with the subject. The first section examines the concept of knowledge centered on classical understanding of the disciplines and metaphysics. This explains that the classical origin of natural sciences in addition to metaphysical inferences regarding the nature of authenticity, which shapes Kant’s work (Nietzsche 90).
Section two replicates Nietzsche’s probe concerning the significance of morality grounded in metaphysics and conventional science. This study opposes that Nietzsche’s designs, in relation to the fact that civilization is subject to the domination of instincts, are symptomatic of his reflections through representational world-view which he replicates in an imaginative expression.
Kant was popular for his proclivity to reason and possession of a logical command.