In addition, there was no synchronization linking paper and electronic information policies and the need to maintain privacy with justifiably free information.
This poor quality documentation may be frequent since national attempts at consistency often get deafen by the absolute complication of the patient care (Michelle, 2006, P. 97). Even though, they do not say so openly, it might be incidental that until keeping the high-quality case records begins to matter enough to clinicians. slight general or no reliable adjust can be anticipated.
There is a lack of standardized approaches to the documentation that would permit continuous records evaluated requirements, and resultant strategies of health care. Following a number of services, every qualified group is still using separate case remarks, held or kept in diverse places, and not expected to be accessible when needed. The place of storing case records in the practice of local health services might show slight pleasure of their significance. Take a situation where the hospital would like to attend to an emergency patient. The Health information management does this. This office is ten miles far from the scene, and this is where the records are kept. Since there is a lack of an electronic system, the doctors cannot verify easily on the past contact of the patient they are about to interrogate. Local tradition does not make access to any available case record in the health centre. During the operational hours, if it is identified that a case file is available, the medical records physician may be convinced to fax a few of the most current letters stored in the case record. Unfortunately, no such skill would exist. The excellent idea the doctor can then anticipate is that a nurse in the hospital delicate area knows the patient and be able to give some related information. Under such conditions, practice can only be based on guesswork and speculations.