To prepare for this Discussion:
Assigned Disorder: Vascular Neurocognitive Disorder
Post:
1/6/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033618_1 1/4
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
OutstandingPerformance
Excellent
Performance
Competent
Performance
Pro�cient
Performance
Room for
Improvement
Main
Posting:
Response to
the
discusion
question is
re�ecive
with critical
analysis and
synthesis
representive
of knowledg
gained from
the course
readings for
the module
and current
credible
sources.
44 (44%) – 44
(44%)
* Thoroughly
responds to the
discusion
question(s) *is
re�ecive with
critical analysis
and synthesis
representive of
knowledg
gained from
the course
readings for the
module and
current credible
sources. *
supported by at
least 3 current,
credible
sources
40 (40%) – 43
(43%)
* Responds to
the discusion
question(s) *is
re�ecive with
critical analysis
and synthesis
representive of
knowledg
gained from
the course
readings for the
module. * 75%
of post has
exceptional
depth and
breadth *
supported by at
least 3 credible
references
35 (35%) – 39
(39%)
* Responds to
most of the
discusion
question(s) *is
somewhat
re�ecive with
critical analysis
and synthesis
representive of
knowledg
gained from
the course
readings for the
module. * 50%
of post has
exceptional
depth and
breadth *
supported by at
least 3 credible
references
31 (31%) – 34
(34%)
* Responds to
some of the
discusion
question(s) *
one to two
criteria are not
addressed or
are
super�cially
addresed *is
somewhat
lacking
re�ection and
critical analysis
and synthesis
*somewhat
represents
knowledge
gained from
the course
readings for
the module. *
post is cited
with fewer than
2 credible
references
0 (0%) – 30
(30%)
* Does not
respond to
the discusion
question(s) *
lacks depth or
super�cially
addresses
criteria *lacks
re�ection and
critical
analysis and
synthesis
*does not
represent
knowledge
gained from
the course
readings for
the module. *
contains only
1 or no
credible
references
Name: NRNP_6670_Week8_Discussion_Rubric
EXIT
Grid View List View
1/6/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033618_1 2/4
OutstandingPerformance
Excellent
Performance
Competent
Performance
Pro�cient
Performance
Room for
Improvement
Main
Posting:
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
* Written
clearly and
concisely *
Contains no
grammatical or
spelling errors
* Fully adheres
to current APA
manual writing
rules and style
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5
(5.5%)
* Written
clearly and
concisely * May
contain one or
no grammatical
or spelling
error * Adheres
to current APA
manual writing
rules and style
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* Written
concisely * May
contain one to
two
grammatical or
spelling error *
Adheres to
current APA
manual writing
rules and style
4 (4%) – 5 (5%)
*Writtten
somewhat
concisely * May
contain more
than two2
spelling or
grammatical
errors *
Contains some
APA formatting
erros
0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
* Not written
clearly or
concisely *
Contains
more than
two spelling
or
grammatical
errors * Does
not adhere to
current APA
manual
writing rules
and style
Main
Posting:
Timely and
full
participation
10 (10%) – 10
(10%)
* meets
requirements
for timely and
full
participation *
posts main
discussion by
due date
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
* does not
meet
requirement
for full
participation
First
Reponse
Post to
colleague’s
main post
that is
re�ective
and justi�ed
with credible
sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
* response
exhibits critical
thinking and
application to
practice
settings *
responds to
questions
posed by
faculty * the
use of scholarly
sources to
support ideas
demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding
of learning
objectives
8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5
(8.5%)
* response
exhibits critical
thinking and
application to
practice
settings
7.5 (7.5%) – 8
(8%)
* response has
some depth
and may
exhibit critical
thinking or
application to
practice setting
6.5 (6.5%) – 7
(7%)
* response is
on topic, may
have some
depth
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
* reponse
may not be on
topic, lacks
depth
1/6/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033618_1 3/4
OutstandingPerformance
Excellent
Performance
Competent
Performance
Pro�cient
Performance
Room for
Improvement
First
Reponse:
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
*
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
fully answered
if posed *
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
two or more
credible
sources *
Response is
e�ectively
written in
Standard
Edited English
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5
(5.5%)
*
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
answered if
posed *
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
two or more
credible
sources *
Response is
e�ectively
written in
Standard
Edited English
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
*
Communication
is mostly
professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
mostly
answered if
posed *
Provides
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
few credible
sources *
Response is
written in
Standard
Edited English
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5
(4.5%)
* Responses
posted in the
discussion may
lack e�ective
professional
communication
* Response to
faculty
questions are
somewhat
answered if
posed * Few or
no credible
sources are
cited
0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
* Responses
posted in the
discussion
lack e�ective
* Response to
faculty
questions are
missing * No
credible
sources are
cited
First
Reponse:
Timely and
full
participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* meets
requirements
for timely and
full
participation *
posts by due
date
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
* does not
meet
requirement
for full
participation
Second
Reponse:
Post to
colleague’s
main post
that is
re�ective
and justi�ed
with credible
sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
* response
exhibits critical
thinking and
application to
practice
settings *
responds to
questions
posed by
faculty * the
use of scholarly
sources to
support ideas
demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding
of learning
objectives
8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5
(8.5%)
* response
exhibits critical
thinking and
application to
practice
settings
7.5 (7.5%) – 8
(8%)
* response has
some depth
and may
exhibit critical
thinking or
application to
practice setting
6.5 (6.5%) – 7
(7%)
* response is
on topic, may
have some
depth
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
* reponse
may not be on
topic, lacks
depth
1/6/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033618_1 4/4
OutstandingPerformance
Excellent
Performance
Competent
Performance
Pro�cient
Performance
Room for
Improvement
Second
Reponse:
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
*
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
fully answered
if posed *
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
two or more
credible
sources *
Response is
e�ectively
written in
Standard
Edited English
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5
(5.5%)
*
Communication
is professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
answered if
posed *
Provides clear,
concise
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
two or more
credible
sources *
Response is
e�ectively
written in
Standard
Edited English
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
*
Communication
is mostly
professional
and respectful
to colleagues *
Response to
faculty
questions are
mostly
answered if
posed *
Provides
opinions and
ideas that are
supported by
few credible
sources *
Response is
written in
Standard
Edited English
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5
(4.5%)
* Responses
posted in the
discussion may
lack e�ective
professional
communication
* Response to
faculty
questions are
somewhat
answered if
posed * Few or
no credible
sources are
cited
0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
* Responses
posted in the
discussion
lack e�ective
* Response to
faculty
questions are
missing * No
credible
sources are
cited
Second
Reponse:
Timely and
full
participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* meets
requirements
for timely and
full
participation *
posts by due
date
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
* does not
meet
requirement
for full
participation
Total Points: 100
Name: NRNP_6670_Week8_Discussion_Rubric
EXIT
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Achiever Papers is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Dissertation Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, if anything is unclear, you may always chat with us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download