For this week’s discussion, you will again need to reflect on your negotiation history and identify a negotiation experience that you consider significant. You should be selecting a different negotiation experience for each week’s discussion so that you are exploring many different scenarios and applying your growing understanding of strategic negotiation to those scenarios. For example, if you have been using family-based negotiation events in Week 1 and Week 2, try using a professional (e.g., business or organization) negotiation for this week. You should not be using the same negotiation example each week.
For the first paragraph of your initial post, describe the negotiation event that you are using for this week’s discussion, including the participants, the key issues, and the outcome.
For the second part of your initial post, evaluate any one of the following starter bullet points, using research on course concepts to support your analysis:
In what ways did each party function as a sender and a receiver?
What channels were used?
How did the use of nonverbal communication influence the negotiation?
What feedback methods were used, and how might have feedback been used to enhance negotiations?
What distortions were evident?
What were the sources of those distortions?
What other communication problems existed?
How did those distortions and problems impact the negotiation?
What could be done to correct those issues?
Were they open ended?
Were they leading?
How did the questions impact the negotiation?
Did the question type (e.g., leading versus open ended) fit the negotiation context? Provide an example of how you might reword a question (e.g., change a leading question to an open-ended question) that occurred in your negotiation to support a more effective negotiation process.
Did either party use active listening?
Did either party use inattentive listening or manipulative listening?
What behaviors did you see that support your conclusions?
How did the listening skills displayed in the negotiation scenario influence the outcome?
How were cultural (either in a multicultural sense or a global sense) and gender factors evident in your example?
What do you wish you had known during the negotiation that you now know (e.g., based upon some research into the cultures of the parties present in the negotiation)?
How would you change your approach in future negotiations to account for cultural and gender concerns?
How was power or leverage utilized in your negotiation?
What power bases were evident? Assess the ethical nature of how power was used.
How did power influence the outcome?
How might you build greater power in future negotiations?
Conclude your posting with a summary paragraph that synthesizes one or two key issues or points of your initial post.
Submission Details:
· Your initial post should be 1–2 pages (500–1,000 words) long. Cite any sources you use in APA format.
· Due by 2/27/25 at 10:30pm CST
Requirements:
1. Make certain to include in text citations from your course text in addition to your outside leadership resources within your main post. This adds credibility to your argument.
[Textbooks]:
Lewicki, R., Saunders, D., & Barry, B. (2023).
Negotiation (9th ed.)
. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. ISBN: 9781265608750
and
Lewicki, R., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. (2014).
Negotiation: Readings, Exercises, and Cases (7th ed.)
. McGraw-Hill Learning Solutions. ISBN: 0077862422
2. No plagiarism will be tolerated. Must be in 7th Edition APA format with cited sources within the last 5 years.
3. No AI support, score must be 0% and less than < 10% score on Turnitin
Communication Themes in Negotiations
For this week’s discussion, you will again need to reflect on your negotiation history and identify a negotiation experience that you consider significant.
You should be selecting a different negotiation experience for each week’s discussion so that you are exploring many different scenarios and applying your growing understanding of strategic negotiation to those scenarios. For example, if you have been using family-based negotiation events in
Week 1 and
Week 2, try using a professional (e.g., business or organization) negotiation for this week. You should not be using the same negotiation example each week.
For
the first paragraph of your initial post, describe the negotiation event that you are using for this week’s discussion, including the participants, the key issues, and the outcome.
For
the second part of your initial post, evaluate any
one of the following starter bullet points, using research on course concepts to support your analysis:
· In the basic communication model, information is sent and received using channels. Apply the basic communication model to your negotiation model.
· In what ways did each party function as a sender and a receiver?
· What channels were used?
· How did the use of nonverbal communication influence the negotiation?
· What feedback methods were used, and how might have feedback been used to enhance negotiations?
· Distractions and distortions (noise) can occur in the negotiation process.
· What distortions were evident?
· What were the sources of those distortions?
· What other communication problems existed?
· How did those distortions and problems impact the negotiation?
· What could be done to correct those issues?
· Questioning is a powerful communication tool and is also very effective in the negotiation process. Perceiving what questions to ask can often lead to more creative alternatives and to better solutions. For your situation, evaluate the questions that were asked.
· Were they open ended?
· Were they leading?
· How did the questions impact the negotiation?
· Did the question type (e.g., leading versus open ended) fit the negotiation context? Provide an example of how you might reword a question (e.g., change a leading question to an open-ended question) that occurred in your negotiation to support a more effective negotiation process.
· Active listening is an important skill for leaders and negotiators. Being fully attentive to the other party and asking clarifying questions to ensure understanding are the primary skills. Evaluate the listening behaviors in your negotiation scenario.
· Did either party use active listening?
· Did either party use inattentive listening or manipulative listening?
· What behaviors did you see that support your conclusions?
· How did the listening skills displayed in the negotiation scenario influence the outcome?
· Culture and gender increase the complexity of negotiation events.
· How were cultural (either in a multicultural sense or a global sense) and gender factors evident in your example?
· What do you wish you had known during the negotiation that you now know (e.g., based upon some research into the cultures of the parties present in the negotiation)?
· How would you change your approach in future negotiations to account for cultural and gender concerns?
· Power can be used in overt or subtle ways. Power can also be conceptualized as power from, power with, or power over.
· How was power or leverage utilized in your negotiation?
· What power bases were evident? Assess the ethical nature of how power was used.
· How did power influence the outcome?
· How might you build greater power in future negotiations?
Conclude your posting with a summary paragraph that synthesizes one or two key issues or points of your initial post.
Submission Details:
1. Your initial post should be 1–2 pages (500–1,000 words) long. Cite any sources you use in APA format.
1. Each Covered Heading must contain 3+ credible cited sources and a conclusion summarizing talking points.
1.
Due by 2/27/25 at 10:30pm CST
Requirements:
1.
Make certain to include in text citations from your course text in addition to your outside leadership resources within your main post. This adds credibility to your argument.
[Textbooks]:
Lewicki, R., Saunders, D., & Barry, B. (2023).
Negotiation (9th ed.)
. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. ISBN: 9781265608750
and
Lewicki, R., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. (2014).
Negotiation: Readings, Exercises, and Cases (7th ed.)
. McGraw-Hill Learning Solutions. ISBN: 0077862422
2.
No plagiarism will be tolerated. Must be in 7th Edition APA format with cited sources within the last 5 years.
3.
No AI support, score must be 0% and less than < 10% score on Turnitin
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Achiever Papers is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Dissertation Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, if anything is unclear, you may always chat with us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download