For your third paper, please write 1,000 words where you discuss a place where ethics and the law are at odds. You should identify scenarios where the prescription of one disagrees with another. You could write about something that is permitted by law but forbidden by ethics, or something that is forbidden by law, but is compulsory under certain moral frameworks. Obviously, being clear about your moral framework, and identifying the relevant philosophy is essential to the success of this paper.
Your thesis should clearly lay out the terms of the disagreement.
Your first two main points should first outline the laws (MP1), then the moral theory (MP2). Be sure to keep the scenarios at the heart of these discussions. Save the comparisons for the third and final main point. Follow this with a conclusion.
Papers should be in APA style with a title and reference page. No abstract required.
No additional sources are required for this paper, but any sources you consult should be included in your reference page and cited in-text where appropriate.
