I will pay for the following article Analysis of Cross-Cultural Psychology. The work is to be 5 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. Competence was defined in terms of appropriateness and effectiveness. A pilot study with 30 employees in Singapore studied the appraisals of communication competence during intercultural conflict incidents. While the Western expatriates judged the other group on the criterion if their communication style was engaged and direct. This data was supposed to tell their score on the effectiveness scale. This data was supposed to tell their score on the effectiveness scale. .
Cross-cultural psychology is the study of human behavior and its variability in different cultures. It is a research methodology and not an entirely different field of psychology (Lonner, 2000). Ecologies define cultures and these cultures shape personalities. There are two kinds of variations in a personality. the universal and the cultural specific (Triandis & Suh, 2002). The culturally specific aspects usually mean cultural syndromes such as collectivism, individualism, complexity, and tightness (Triandis & Suh, 2002). Many of the past studies suggest that the big five personality factors develop in different cultures. But such universality is probably an exaggerated claim. The reason is that most of the studies have not yet included the enculturation or the cultural specific traits (Triandis & Suh, 2002). Moreover, such literature is highly inclined towards Western cultures.
It is a common perception that cultural psychology and cross-cultural psychology are fundamentally the same concepts. But there are significant differences between these phases in their methods, assumptions, and scope. For instance, cross-cultural psychology deals with statistical aspects of culture, whereas cultural psychology is more focused on cultural dynamics (Triandis & Suh, 2002). The methodology used in the two fields is also distinct. Cross-cultural psychology usually compares two or more cultures on several variables to find out similarities and differences in psychological functioning (Triandis & Suh, 2002).