Chapter 4- what is your recommendation for future research?
Chapter 4
Introduction (One Paragraph)
The evaluation system is as follows:
– 0 indicates that the work is unsatisfactory, absent, or unacceptable, and substantial revisions
are required.
– 1 indicates that the work is less than satisfactory and does not meet expectations, requiring
revisions.
– 2 indicates that the work is satisfactory and meets the minimum expectations, but some
revisions may be suggested or required.
– 3 indicates that the work is good and meets expectations, with minimum revisions may be
suggested or required.
– 4 indicates that the work is excellent and exceeds expectations, requiring no revisions.
NOTE: Student who score two or lower in at least three sections must revise them and address
the reviewer’s other feedback.
Criterion
Student ’s
Score
Professors Score
Introduction of Chapter 4 aims to clarify why the study
is crucial, particularly in enhancing HR professionals’
understanding of the main thesis topic as highlighted by
the problem statement in Chapter 1.
• Highlights who benefit from implementing the
study’s results, focusing on HR practitioners and the
concrete strategies they can adopt.
• Ensures all recommendations are directly linked to
the original problem statement, avoiding
speculation and unsupported information.
• Suggests areas for future research, enriching the
academic conversation and inviting further
investigation.
• Includes personal insights and recommendations,
offering a unique perspective and enriching
academic discourse.
• Concludes by summarizing key contributions of the
study and the importance of the recommendations
for HR professional practice.
Student writes this section in a way that is well
structured, has a logical flow, and uses correct
paragraph structure, sentence structure, punctuation,
and APA format.
Professor’s Comments:
Recommendations for Future Research (Three Paragraphs)
The evaluation system is as follows:
– 0 indicates that the work is unsatisfactory, absent, or unacceptable, and substantial revisions
are required.
– 1 indicates that the work is less than satisfactory and does not meet expectations, requiring
revisions.
– 2 indicates that the work is satisfactory and meets the minimum expectations, but some
revisions may be suggested or required.
– 3 indicates that the work is good and meets expectations, with minimum revisions may be
suggested or required.
– 4 indicates that the work is excellent and exceeds expectations, requiring no revisions.
NOTE: Student who score two or lower in at least three sections must revise them and address
the reviewer’s other feedback.
Criterion
Student ’s
Professor’s Score
Score
• Recommendations for future research highlight possible
paths left unexplored due to time constraints, suggesting
new directions based on current findings.
• It serves as a handoff, encouraging other researchers to
continue where one left off, highlighting the importance
and interest of potential future studies.
• Identifies specific, promising areas not fully explored in
the study, including emergent topics or unanswered
questions.
• Provides a roadmap for continuing research, pointing
out where further investigation can lead to significant
discoveries.
• Connects suggested future research topics back to the
original problem and findings, ensuring coherence and
relevance within the broader research context.
Examples of Future Research Recommendations:
o Study the long-term effects on engagement,
productivity, and work-life balance. Investigate
strategies for maintaining cohesion and culture
remotely.
o Examine the effectiveness and outcomes of diversity,
equity, and inclusion efforts. Explore barriers to
implementation and suggest solutions.
o Investigate ethical considerations, effectiveness, and
employee perceptions of AI in recruitment, performance
evaluations, and monitoring.
o Research the impact of workplace mental health
programs on productivity, absenteeism, and turnover.
Explore HR’s role in creating supportive environments.
o
o
o
Study evolving workforce skills and the effectiveness of
training programs. Assess the impact of digital learning
tools.
Explore sustainability in HR practices and how HR
contributes to environmental and social goals.
Investigate employee perceptions of CSR initiatives.
Research HRD strategies for gig workers and
freelancers, including training, development, and career
advancement opportunities
The Student writes this section in a way that is well
structured, has a logical flow, and uses correct paragraph
structure, sentence structure, punctuation, and APA format.
Professor’s Comments:
Personal Reflect (Two to three paragraphs)
The evaluation system is as follows:
– 0 indicates that the work is unsatisfactory, absent, or unacceptable, and substantial revisions
are required.
– 1 indicates that the work is less than satisfactory and does not meet expectations, requiring
revisions.
– 2 indicates that the work is satisfactory and meets the minimum expectations, but some
revisions may be suggested or required.
– 3 indicates that the work is good and meets expectations, with minimum revisions may be
suggested or required.
– 4 indicates that the work is excellent and exceeds expectations, requiring no revisions.
NOTE: Student who score two or lower in at least three sections must revise them and address
the reviewer’s other feedback.
Criterion
Student ’s Professors Score
Score
• Summarize what was learned from the research project.
– Include planning and execution phases.
– Discuss findings and insights.
• Share how understanding of research evolved.
– Reflect on achievements and challenges in data
analysis.
– Note factors that helped or hindered objectives.
• Emphasize the importance of reflection.
– Focus on the learning process throughout the
project.
–
Highlight design, execution, and interpretation of
results.
– Mention the importance of addressing deviations
from the original plan.
– – Provide insights into overall experience and
lessons learned.
The Student writes this section in a way that is well
structured, has a logical flow, and uses correct paragraph
structure, sentence structure, punctuation, and APA format.
Professor’s Comments:
Conclusion (Two Paragraphs)
The evaluation system is as follows:
– 0 indicates that the work is unsatisfactory, absent, or unacceptable, and substantial revisions
are required.
– 1 indicates that the work is less than satisfactory and does not meet expectations, requiring
revisions.
– 2 indicates that the work is satisfactory and meets the minimum expectations, but some
revisions may be suggested or required.
– 3 indicates that the work is good and meets expectations, with minimum revisions may be
suggested or required.
– 4 indicates that the work is excellent and exceeds expectations, requiring no revisions.
NOTE: Student who score two or lower in at least three sections must revise them and address
the reviewer’s other feedback.
Criterion
Student ’s Professor’s Score
Score
•
This section focuses on key takeaways from the study.
•
Provide a conclusion that can be drawn when research
conducted (survey and literature) are taken together as a
single entity.
•
What is the overall message of the data? Include
citations within each paragraph.
Synthesis: Each paragraph begins with a topic sentence (not
cited) that tells the reader what the paragraph discusses.
Synthesize three to four authors’ thoughts (cited) that
support your topic sentence. Provide a concluding (or
transition) paragraph that takes the reader into the next
section.
The Student writes this section in a way that is well
structured, has a logical flow, and uses correct paragraph
structure, sentence structure, punctuation, and APA format.
Professor’s Comments:
Chapter 4
Introduction (One Paragraph)
The evaluation system is as follows:
– 0 indicates that the work is unsatisfactory, absent, or unacceptable, and substantial revisions
are required.
– 1 indicates that the work is less than satisfactory and does not meet expectations, requiring
revisions.
– 2 indicates that the work is satisfactory and meets the minimum expectations, but some
revisions may be suggested or required.
– 3 indicates that the work is good and meets expectations, with minimum revisions may be
suggested or required.
– 4 indicates that the work is excellent and exceeds expectations, requiring no revisions.
NOTE: Student who score two or lower in at least three sections must revise them and address
the reviewer’s other feedback.
Criterion
Student ’s
Score
Professors Score
Introduction of Chapter 4 aims to clarify why the study
is crucial, particularly in enhancing HR professionals’
understanding of the main thesis topic as highlighted by
the problem statement in Chapter 1.
• Highlights who benefit from implementing the
study’s results, focusing on HR practitioners and the
concrete strategies they can adopt.
• Ensures all recommendations are directly linked to
the original problem statement, avoiding
speculation and unsupported information.
• Suggests areas for future research, enriching the
academic conversation and inviting further
investigation.
• Includes personal insights and recommendations,
offering a unique perspective and enriching
academic discourse.
• Concludes by summarizing key contributions of the
study and the importance of the recommendations
for HR professional practice.
Student writes this section in a way that is well
structured, has a logical flow, and uses correct
paragraph structure, sentence structure, punctuation,
and APA format.
Professor’s Comments:
Recommendations for Future Research (Three Paragraphs)
The evaluation system is as follows:
– 0 indicates that the work is unsatisfactory, absent, or unacceptable, and substantial revisions
are required.
– 1 indicates that the work is less than satisfactory and does not meet expectations, requiring
revisions.
– 2 indicates that the work is satisfactory and meets the minimum expectations, but some
revisions may be suggested or required.
– 3 indicates that the work is good and meets expectations, with minimum revisions may be
suggested or required.
– 4 indicates that the work is excellent and exceeds expectations, requiring no revisions.
NOTE: Student who score two or lower in at least three sections must revise them and address
the reviewer’s other feedback.
Criterion
Student ’s
Professor’s Score
Score
• Recommendations for future research highlight possible
paths left unexplored due to time constraints, suggesting
new directions based on current findings.
• It serves as a handoff, encouraging other researchers to
continue where one left off, highlighting the importance
and interest of potential future studies.
• Identifies specific, promising areas not fully explored in
the study, including emergent topics or unanswered
questions.
• Provides a roadmap for continuing research, pointing
out where further investigation can lead to significant
discoveries.
• Connects suggested future research topics back to the
original problem and findings, ensuring coherence and
relevance within the broader research context.
Examples of Future Research Recommendations:
o Study the long-term effects on engagement,
productivity, and work-life balance. Investigate
strategies for maintaining cohesion and culture
remotely.
o Examine the effectiveness and outcomes of diversity,
equity, and inclusion efforts. Explore barriers to
implementation and suggest solutions.
o Investigate ethical considerations, effectiveness, and
employee perceptions of AI in recruitment, performance
evaluations, and monitoring.
o Research the impact of workplace mental health
programs on productivity, absenteeism, and turnover.
Explore HR’s role in creating supportive environments.
o
o
o
Study evolving workforce skills and the effectiveness of
training programs. Assess the impact of digital learning
tools.
Explore sustainability in HR practices and how HR
contributes to environmental and social goals.
Investigate employee perceptions of CSR initiatives.
Research HRD strategies for gig workers and
freelancers, including training, development, and career
advancement opportunities
The Student writes this section in a way that is well
structured, has a logical flow, and uses correct paragraph
structure, sentence structure, punctuation, and APA format.
Professor’s Comments:
Personal Reflect (Two to three paragraphs)
The evaluation system is as follows:
– 0 indicates that the work is unsatisfactory, absent, or unacceptable, and substantial revisions
are required.
– 1 indicates that the work is less than satisfactory and does not meet expectations, requiring
revisions.
– 2 indicates that the work is satisfactory and meets the minimum expectations, but some
revisions may be suggested or required.
– 3 indicates that the work is good and meets expectations, with minimum revisions may be
suggested or required.
– 4 indicates that the work is excellent and exceeds expectations, requiring no revisions.
NOTE: Student who score two or lower in at least three sections must revise them and address
the reviewer’s other feedback.
Criterion
Student ’s Professors Score
Score
• Summarize what was learned from the research project.
– Include planning and execution phases.
– Discuss findings and insights.
• Share how understanding of research evolved.
– Reflect on achievements and challenges in data
analysis.
– Note factors that helped or hindered objectives.
• Emphasize the importance of reflection.
– Focus on the learning process throughout the
project.
–
Highlight design, execution, and interpretation of
results.
– Mention the importance of addressing deviations
from the original plan.
– – Provide insights into overall experience and
lessons learned.
The Student writes this section in a way that is well
structured, has a logical flow, and uses correct paragraph
structure, sentence structure, punctuation, and APA format.
Professor’s Comments:
Conclusion (Two Paragraphs)
The evaluation system is as follows:
– 0 indicates that the work is unsatisfactory, absent, or unacceptable, and substantial revisions
are required.
– 1 indicates that the work is less than satisfactory and does not meet expectations, requiring
revisions.
– 2 indicates that the work is satisfactory and meets the minimum expectations, but some
revisions may be suggested or required.
– 3 indicates that the work is good and meets expectations, with minimum revisions may be
suggested or required.
– 4 indicates that the work is excellent and exceeds expectations, requiring no revisions.
NOTE: Student who score two or lower in at least three sections must revise them and address
the reviewer’s other feedback.
Criterion
Student ’s Professor’s Score
Score
•
This section focuses on key takeaways from the study.
•
Provide a conclusion that can be drawn when research
conducted (survey and literature) are taken together as a
single entity.
•
What is the overall message of the data? Include
citations within each paragraph.
Synthesis: Each paragraph begins with a topic sentence (not
cited) that tells the reader what the paragraph discusses.
Synthesize three to four authors’ thoughts (cited) that
support your topic sentence. Provide a concluding (or
transition) paragraph that takes the reader into the next
section.
The Student writes this section in a way that is well
structured, has a logical flow, and uses correct paragraph
structure, sentence structure, punctuation, and APA format.
Professor’s Comments:
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Achiever Papers is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Dissertation Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, if anything is unclear, you may always chat with us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download